Help

How to Assert a Residential Tenant Claim

Learn how to successfully represent tenants in private practice, including an overview of common claims, case selection, and practical considerations before bringing a suit, using “fee-shifting” claims to support a practice focused on serving low- and moderate-income tenants

recorded
  • Product Number: 2240043WAU
  • Publication Date: 10/23/2023
  • Length: 2 hours CLE Credit Note
  • Copyright: © 2023 MCLE, Inc.
  • Add to Favorites List

Your Selection:

Also Available:
On Demand video and audio
Related On Demand Videos
See Agenda below to purchase individual video segments from this program. Pricing varies by video length. Member and new lawyer pricing available. Free for OnlinePass subscribers.
  • Product Description
  • Agenda & Materials
  • Faculty
  • Product Description

    Product Description

    Residential tenants cannot generally obtain legal representation. The Massachusetts Trial Court, Department of Research and Planning statistics for 2023 report that over 95% of tenants in eviction cases were unrepresented. Tenants often have serious claims but cannot always obtain counsel in cases where their shelter is at risk or where they are living in seriously substandard housing.

    Massachusetts has several “fee-shifting” statutes that require the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s reasonable attorney fees and costs if the plaintiff wins. These laws enable attorneys to pursue meritorious claims and recover for their time and expenses regardless of the tenant’s ability to pay an hourly retainer. The fee-shifting statues allow low-income tenants to retain their homes, obtain repairs for dangerous and unsafe conditions, prevent housing discrimination, and stop illegal lockouts. Without attorneys, these rights are often not enforced; fee-shifting allows attorneys to provide tenants with access to justice.

    Learn from two attorneys who sustain viable “fee-shifting” practices and discuss the proper analysis for case selection, including where to file cases and how to litigate them.

  • Agenda

    Agenda & Materials

    Please Note

    MCLE on demand programs are delivered completely online, underscoring their convenience and appeal. There are no published print materials. All written materials are available electronically only through a link included on the on demand program page.

  • Faculty

    Chair

    Edward A. Rice, Esq., Broderick Bancroft & Saccardi, Somerville

    Faculty

TOP